Adam alemi

Показано: 1 - 2 из 2

Некоторые метрики заблокированы вашими
настройками согласия
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSFORMATION OF TURKIC-KAZAKH POETRY IN THE CONTEXT OF GLOBALIZATION
(2026-09-30)
Nurbolat Manapbayev
;
Yerkebulan Yerzhanov
;
Şirin YILMAZ
;
Akbota Seisenbayeva
This article examines how philosophical meanings in Turkic-Kazakh poetry are preserved, revised and repositioned under the conditions of globalization. The term ‘Turkic-Kazakh’ is used as a genealogical and analytical designation for the relationship between selected early Turkic texts and later Kazakh poetic traditions; it does not imply an uninterrupted lineage or represent all Turkic literatures. The study applies qualitative comparative interpretation to a purposively selected corpus comprising the Orkhon-Yenisey inscriptions, the Korkyt tradition, Kutadgu Bilig, the hikmets of Khoja Ahmed Yasawi, the zhyrau anthology, and works by Abai, Shakarim, Magzhan Zhumabayev, Olzhas Suleimenov and Tynyshtykbek Abdykakimuly. Lotman’s concept of the semiosphere provides the principal framework, while Heidegger’s account of poetic language and the approaches of Damrosch and Casanova to literary circulation serve as auxiliary perspectives. The analysis identifies three mechanisms of transformation: retention of recurrent philosophical categories, resemanticization of inherited images in response to new historical questions, and circulatory remediation through publication, translation and altered reading contexts. The findings indicate that continuity resides less in an unchanged national essence than in the changing functions assigned to memory, ethical agency, mortality, language and collective belonging. Globalization is therefore treated as a mediated context of interpretation and circulation rather than as the single cause of poetic change.
Некоторые метрики заблокированы вашими
настройками согласия
ТАРИХИ УРБАНИСТІК КЕҢІСТІКТЕГІ ДӘСТҮР МЕН ЖАҢАШЫЛДЫҚТЫҢ ДИАЛЕКТИКАСЫ: ТАРАЗ ҚАЛАСЫНЫҢ МӘДЕНИ КЕҢІСТІГІН ФИЛОСОФИЯЛЫҚ ИНТЕРПРЕТАЦИЯЛАУ
(2026-06-30)
Гүлнар Ранова
;
Гүлнар Ранова
;
Дәуренбек Құсаинов
The article is devoted to the philosophical analysis of the dialectic of tradition and innovation in historical urban space. The core of the problem lies in the fact that urban environments are not only material infrastructures but also symbolic spaces where cultural memory and historical experience are accumulated. In the context of globalization, urban development transforms cultural codes, yet this does not imply their disappearance; instead, they are reinterpreted and adapted to new social conditions. The author’s position is based on understanding tradition and innovation as a dialectical unity: tradition ensures the continuity of cultural meanings, while innovation enables their reinterpretation in accordance with contemporary realities. The solution to the problem is proposed through the philosophical interpretation of urban space as a cultural text, analyzing its historical and symbolic meanings. Using the cultural space of Taraz city as an example, concepts of collective memory and “sites of memory” are examined, revealing mechanisms of cultural continuity. This approach contributes to understanding the humanitarian dimension of urban development and may serve as a theoretical foundation for cultural policies aimed at preserving historical heritage and integrating it into modern processes.

Adam alemi

Фильтры

Настройки

Сортировать по

результатов на странице