Қазақ ұлттық қыздар педагогикалық университеті / Казахский национальный женский педагогический университет
Постоянный URI для этого сообществаhttps://cris.qyzpu.kz/handle/123456789/1
Просмотр
2 результаты
Результаты поиска
- Некоторые метрики заблокированы вашиминастройками согласия
Тип записи:Публикация, STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION OF POLITICAL DISCOURSE(2017-01-01)The article discusses political discourse and its principles and ways to influence it. At present, the domestic and foreign linguistic schools are aimed to identifying the strategic communication in the political discourse, which is a linguist of the national language, in the national consciousness of the people. It also focuses on identifying the research framework of modern political linguistics. The system of political communications influences public consciousness to achieve certain political goals. Today, the public should be a good strategist besides the speaker. In this regard, the article clarified five types of strategic directions, examples are given. It must enter not only one person but a whole society. Since the middle of the last century, political discourse has had its influence in shaping and enhancing the state's image at the international level in various fields. In the conditions of changing the economic situation, the formation of a positive image of the country certainly affects the improvement of economic partnership and economic situation. In this case, of course, a special role is played by political discourse. Discourse is closely related to theory, divided into political and social positions. And in some studies, discourse is a distinctive feature of a political agent. Based on a study in the future, discourse will have a single meaning, regardless of whether it is spoken or visual. A person who writes political texts expresses his political views on these political opinions. Nowadays the speech and actions of political figures in various fields of political linguistics are studied scientifically. And also aims at identifying a range of studies of modern political linguistics.Цитирования (OpenCitations) 1 - Некоторые метрики заблокированы вашиминастройками согласия
Тип записи:Публикация, POWER TRANSITION AND POST-AUTHORITARIAN REFORMS IN KAZAKHSTAN AND UZBEKISTAN: A COMPARATIVE POLITICAL ANALYSIS(2026-05-01); T. NezirThe aim of this study is to analyze the institutional nature of the post-authoritarian power transition in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan and the substantive logic of the announced political reforms from the perspective of comparative politics. In the post-personalist period, the reforms initiated by Kassym-Jomart Tokayev and Shavkat Mirziyoyev have been presented in official discourse as renewal and political modernization. However, evaluating these reforms solely at the level of declared normative commitments is insufficient. This article examines the reforms in a comprehensive manner through the evolution of political discourse, legal and institutional restructuring, and changes in actual governance practices.The theoretical framework of the analysis draws on the concepts of authoritarian adaptation and elite reproduction. The study demonstrates that the substance of the power transition has been oriented more toward the reconfiguration of regime stability than toward democratic institutionalization. In this context, the notion of “reform” functions not as a mechanism for expanding structural pluralism but as an instrument for reaffirming elite agreements and redistributing power resources. This process reveals an internal contradiction between the rhetoric of liberalization and the practice of centralized control.We interpret this dynamic as an institutionalized form of “managed liberalization”: while the discourse of change becomes a tool of legitimation, the structural constraints on political competition remain intact. The study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of regime transformation in Central Asia and refines the conceptual framework for analyzing authoritarian transitions.